@conference {187,
	title = {Learning only a handful of latent variables produces neural-aligned CNN models of the ventral stream},
	booktitle = {Computational and Systems Neuroscience (COSYNE) },
	year = {2024},
	address = {Lisbon, Portugal},
	abstract = {<p>Image-computable modeling of primate ventral stream visual processing has made great strides via brainmapped versions of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that are optimized on thousands of object categories (ImageNet), the performance of which strongly predicts CNNs\&rsquo; neural alignment. However, human and primate visual intelligence extends far beyond object categorization, encompassing a diverse range of tasks, such as estimating the latent variables of object position or pose in the image. The influence of task choice on neural alignment in CNNs, compared to CNN architecture, remains underexplored, partly due to the scarcity of largescale datasets with rich known labels beyond categories. 3D graphic engines, capable of creating training images with detailed information on various latent variables, offer a solution. Here, we asked how the choice of visual tasks that are used to train CNNs (i.e., the set of latent variables to be estimated) affects their ventral stream neural alignment. We focused on the estimation of variables such as object position and pose, and we tested CNNs\&rsquo; neural alignment via the Brain-Score open science platform. We found some of these CNNs had neural alignment scores that were very close to those trained on ImageNet, even though their entire training experience has been on synthetic images. Additionally, we found training models on just a handful of latent variables achieved the same level of neural alignment as models trained on a much larger number of categories, suggesting that latent variable training is more efficient than category training in driving model-neural alignment. Moreover, we found that these models\&rsquo; neural alignment scores scale with the amount of synthetic data used during training, suggesting the potential of obtaining more aligned models with larger synthetic datasets. This study highlights the effectiveness of using synthetic datasets and latent variables in advancing image-computable models of the ventral visual stream.</p>
},
	url = {https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/153744},
	author = {Xie, Yudi and Alter, Esther and Schwartz, Jeremy and DiCarlo, James J}
}
@article {152,
	title = {An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Optogenetics},
	journal = {Neuron},
	year = {2020},
	month = {January 10, 2020},
	type = {NeuroResource},
	abstract = {<p>Optogenetics has revolutionized neuroscience in small laboratory animals, but its effect on animal models more closely related to humans, such as non-human primates (NHPs), has been mixed. To make evidence-based decisions in primate optogenetics, the scientific community would benefit from a centralized database listing all attempts, successful and unsuccessful, of using optogenetics in the primate brain. We contacted members of the community to ask for their contributions to an open science initiative. As of this writing, 45 laboratories around the world contributed more than 1,000 injection experiments, including precise details regarding their methods and outcomes. Of those entries, more than half had not been published. The resource is free for everyone to consult and contribute to on the Open Science Framework website. Here we review some of the insights from this initial release of the database and discuss methodological considerations to improve the success of optogenetic experiments in NHPs.</p>
},
	issn = {08966273},
	doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.027},
	url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896627320307510},
	author = {Tremblay, Sebastien and Acker, Leah and Afraz, Arash and Albaugh, Daniel L. and Amita, Hidetoshi and Andrei, Ariana R. and Angelucci, Alessandra and Aschner, Amir and Balan, Puiu F. and Basso, Michele A. and Benvenuti, Giacomo and Bohlen, Martin O. and Caiola, Michael J. and Calcedo, Roberto and Cavanaugh, James and Chen, Yuzhi and Chen, Spencer and Chernov, Mykyta M. and Clark, Andrew M. and Dai, Ji and Debes, Samantha R. and Deisseroth, Karl and Desimone, Robert and Dragoi, Valentin and Egger, Seth W. and Eldridge, Mark A.G. and El-Nahal, Hala G. and Fabbrini, Francesco and Federer, Frederick and Fetsch, Christopher R. and Fortuna, Michal G. and Friedman, Robert M. and Fujii, Naotaka and Gail, Alexander and Galvan, Adriana and Ghosh, Supriya and Gieselmann, Marc Alwin and Gulli, Roberto A. and Hikosaka, Okihide and Hosseini, Eghbal A. and Hu, Xing and {\"u}er, Janina and Inoue, Ken-ichi and Janz, Roger and Jazayeri, Mehrdad and Jiang, Rundong and Ju, Niansheng and Kar, Kohitij and Klein, Carsten and Kohn, Adam and Komatsu, Misako and Maeda, Kazutaka and Martinez-Trujillo, Julio C. and Matsumoto, Masayuki and Maunsell, John H.R. and Mendoza-Halliday, Diego and Monosov, Ilya E. and Muers, Ross S. and Nurminen, Lauri and Ortiz-Rios, Michael and {\textquoteright}Shea, Daniel J. and Palfi, {\'e}phane and Petkov, Christopher I. and Pojoga, Sorin and Rajalingham, Rishi and Ramakrishnan, Charu and Remington, Evan D. and Revsine, Cambria and Roe, Anna W. and Sabes, Philip N. and Saunders, Richard C. and Scherberger, {\"o}rg and Schmid, Michael C. and Schultz, Wolfram and Seidemann, Eyal and Senova, Yann-Suhan and Shadlen, Michael N. and Sheinberg, David L. and Siu, Caitlin and Smith, Yoland and Solomon, Selina S. and Sommer, Marc A. and Spudich, John L. and Stauffer, William R. and Takada, Masahiko and Tang, Shiming and Thiele, Alexander and Treue, Stefan and Vanduffel, Wim and Vogels, Rufin and Whitmire, Matthew P. and Wichmann, Thomas and Wurtz, Robert H. and Xu, Haoran and Yazdan-Shahmorad, Azadeh and Shenoy, Krishna V. and DiCarlo, James J. and Platt, Michael L.}
}
