@article {147, title = {Integrative Benchmarking to Advance Neurally Mechanistic Models of Human Intelligence}, journal = {Neuron}, year = {2020}, month = {Jan-09-2020}, abstract = {

A potentially organizing goal of the brain and cognitive sciences is to accurately explain domains of human intelligence as executable, neurally mechanistic models. Years of research have led to models that capture experimental results in individual behavioral tasks and individual brain regions. We here advocate for taking the next step: integrating experimental results from many laboratories into suites of benchmarks that, when considered together, push mechanistic models toward explaining entire domains of intelligence, such as vision, language, and motor control. Given recent successes of neurally mechanistic models and the surging availability of neural, anatomical, and behavioral data, we believe that now is the time to create integrative benchmarking platforms that incentivize ambitious, unified models. This perspective discusses the advantages and the challenges of this approach and proposes specific steps to achieve this goal in the domain of visual intelligence with the case study of an integrative benchmarking platform called Brain-Score.

}, issn = {08966273}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.040}, url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S089662732030605X}, author = {Schrimpf, Martin and Kubilius, Jonas and Lee, Michael J. and Murty, NAR and Ajemian, Robert and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {148, title = {ThreeDWorld: A Platform for Interactive Multi-Modal Physical Simulation}, journal = {arXiv}, year = {2020}, month = {July 9, 2020}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

We introduce ThreeDWorld (TDW), a platform for interactive multi-modal physical simulation. With TDW, users can simulate high-fidelity sensory data and physical interactions between mobile agents and objects in a wide variety of rich 3D environments. TDW has several unique properties: 1) realtime near photo-realistic image rendering quality; 2) a library of objects and environments with materials for high-quality rendering, and routines enabling user customization of the asset library; 3) generative procedures for efficiently building classes of new environments 4) high-fidelity audio rendering; 5) believable and realistic physical interactions for a wide variety of material types, including cloths, liquid, and deformable objects; 6) a range of \"avatar\" types that serve as embodiments of AI agents, with the option for user avatar customization; and 7) support for human interactions with VR devices. TDW also provides a rich API enabling multiple agents to interact within a simulation and return a range of sensor and physics data representing the state of the world. We present initial experiments enabled by the platform around emerging research directions in computer vision, machine learning, and cognitive science, including multi-modal physical scene understanding, multi-agent interactions, models that \"learn like a child\", and attention studies in humans and neural networks. The simulation platform will be made publicly available.

}, url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04954}, author = {Gan, Chuang and Schwartz, Jeremy and Alter, Seth and Schrimpf, Martin and Traer, James and De Freitas, Julian and Kubilius, Jonas and Bhandwaldar, Abhishek and Haber, Nick and Sano, Megumi and Wang, Elias and Mrowca, Damian and Lingelbach, Michael and Curtis, Aidan and Figelis, Kevin and Bear, Daniel M. and Gutfreund, Dan and Cox, David and DiCarlo, James J. and McDermott, Josh and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. and Yamins, Daniel L.K.} } @article {4, title = {Evidence that recurrent circuits are critical to the ventral stream{\textquoteright}s execution of core object recognition behavior}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {22}, year = {2019}, month = {01/2019}, pages = {974 - 983}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/s41593-019-0392-5}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-019-0392-5}, author = {Kar, Kohitij and Kubilius, Jonas and Schmidt, Kailyn and Issa, Elias B. and DiCarlo, James J.} } @conference {166, title = {Using Brain-Score to Evaluate and Build Neural Networks for Brain-Like Object Recognition}, booktitle = {Computational and Systems Neuroscience (COSYNE)}, year = {2019}, address = {Denver, CO}, author = {Schrimpf, Martin and Kubilius, Jonas and Hong, Ha and Majaj, Najib and Rajalingham, Rishi and Issa, Elias B and Kar, Kohitij and Ziemba, Corey M and Bashivan, Pouya and Prescott-Roy, Jonathan and Schmidt, Kailyn and Yamins, Daniel LK and DiCarlo, James J} } @article {22, title = {Brain-Score: Which Artificial Neural Network for Object Recognition is most Brain-Like?}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {09/2018}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

The internal representations of early deep artificial neural networks (ANNs) were found to be remarkably similar to the internal neural representations measured experimentally in the primate brain. Here we ask, as deep ANNs have continued to evolve, are they becoming more or less brain-like? ANNs that are most functionally similar to the brain will contain mechanisms that are most like those used by the brain. We therefore developed Brain-Score - a composite of multiple neural and behavioral benchmarks that score any ANN on how similar it is to the brain\&$\#$39;s mechanisms for core object recognition - and we deployed it to evaluate a wide range of state-of-the-art deep ANNs. Using this scoring system, we here report that: (1) DenseNet-169, CORnet-S and ResNet-101 are the most brain-like ANNs. (2) There remains considerable variability in neural and behavioral responses that is not predicted by any ANN, suggesting that no ANN model has yet captured all the relevant mechanisms. (3) Extending prior work, we found that gains in ANN ImageNet performance led to gains on Brain-Score. However, correlation weakened at \>= 70\% top-1 ImageNet performance, suggesting that additional guidance from neuroscience is needed to make further advances in capturing brain mechanisms. (4) We uncovered smaller (i.e. less complex) ANNs that are more brain-like than many of the best-performing ImageNet models, which suggests the opportunity to simplify ANNs to better understand the ventral stream. The scoring system used here is far from complete. However, we propose that evaluating and tracking model-benchmark correspondences through a Brain-Score that is regularly updated with new brain data is an exciting opportunity: experimental benchmarks can be used to guide machine network evolution, and machine networks are mechanistic hypotheses of the brain\&$\#$39;s network and thus drive next experiments. To facilitate both of these, we release Brain-Score.org: a platform that hosts the neural and behavioral benchmarks, where ANNs for visual processing can be submitted to receive a Brain-Score and their rank relative to other models, and where new experimental data can be naturally incorporated.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1101/407007}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/407007v2.full.pdf}, author = {Martin Schrimpf and Kubilius, Jonas and Ha Hong and Najib Majaj and Rajalingham, Rishi and Issa, Elias B. and Kar, Kohitij and Bashivan, Pouya and Jonathan Prescott-Roy and Schmidt, Kailyn and Daniel L. K. Yamins and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {23, title = {CORnet: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms of Core Object Recognition}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {09/2018}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

Deep artificial neural networks with spatially repeated processing (a.k.a., deep convolutional ANNs) have been established as the best class of candidate models of visual processing in primate ventral visual processing stream. Over the past five years, these ANNs have evolved from a simple feedforward eight-layer architecture in AlexNet to extremely deep and branching NASNet architectures, demonstrating increasingly better object categorization performance and increasingly better explanatory power of both neural and behavioral responses. However, from the neuroscientist\&$\#$39;s point of view, the relationship between such very deep architectures and the ventral visual pathway is incomplete in at least two ways. On the one hand, current state-of-the-art ANNs appear to be too complex (e.g., now over 100 levels) compared with the relatively shallow cortical hierarchy (4-8 levels), which makes it difficult to map their elements to those in the ventral visual stream and to understand what they are doing. On the other hand, current state-of-the-art ANNs appear to be not complex enough in that they lack recurrent connections and the resulting neural response dynamics that are commonplace in the ventral visual stream. Here we describe our ongoing efforts to resolve both of these issues by developing a \"CORnet\" family of deep neural network architectures. Rather than just seeking high object recognition performance (as the state-of-the-art ANNs above), we instead try to reduce the model family to its most important elements and then gradually build new ANNs with recurrent and skip connections while monitoring both performance and the match between each new CORnet model and a large body of primate brain and behavioral data. We report here that our current best ANN model derived from this approach (CORnet-S) is among the top models on Brain-Score, a composite benchmark for comparing models to the brain, but is simpler than other deep ANNs in terms of the number of convolutions performed along the longest path of information processing in the model. All CORnet models are available at\ https://github.com/dicarlolab/CORnet, and we plan to update this manuscript and the available models in this family as they are produced.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1101/408385}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/408385v1.full.pdf}, author = {Kubilius, Jonas and Martin Schrimpf and Aran Nayebi and Daniel Bear and Daniel L. K. Yamins and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {19, title = {Evidence that recurrent circuits are critical to the ventral stream{\textquoteright}s execution of core object recognition behavior}, journal = {bioRxiv}, year = {2018}, month = {06/2018}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

Non-recurrent deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are currently the best models of core object recognition; a behavior supported by the densely recurrent primate ventral stream, culminating in the inferior temporal (IT) cortex. Are these recurrent circuits critical to ventral stream\&$\#$39;s execution of this behavior? We reasoned that, if recurrence is critical, then primates should outperform feedforward-only DCNNs for some images, and that these images should require additional processing time beyond the feedforward IT response. Here we first used behavioral methods to discover hundreds of these \"challenge\" images. Second, using large-scale IT electrophysiology in animals performing core recognition tasks, we observed that behaviorally-sufficient, linearly-decodable object identity solutions emerged ~30ms (on average) later in IT for challenge images compared to DCNN and primate performance-matched \"control\" images. We observed these same late solutions even during passive viewing. Third, consistent with a failure of feedforward computations, the behaviorally-critical late-phase IT population response patterns evoked by the challenge images were poorly predicted by DCNN activations. Interestingly, deeper CNNs better predicted these late IT responses, suggesting a functional equivalence between recurrence and additional nonlinear transformations. Our results argue that automatically-evoked recurrent circuits are critical even for rapid object identification. By precisely comparing current DCNNs, primate behavior and IT population dynamics, we provide guidance for future recurrent model development.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1101/354753}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/354753v1.full.pdf}, author = {Kar, Kohitij and Kubilius, Jonas and Schmidt, Kailyn and Issa, Elias B and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {20, title = {Task-Driven Convolutional Recurrent Models of the Visual System}, journal = {arXiv}, year = {2018}, month = {06/2018}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

Feed-forward convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are currently state-of-the-art for object classification tasks such as ImageNet. Further, they are quantitatively accurate models of temporally-averaged responses of neurons in the primate brain\&$\#$39;s visual system. However, biological visual systems have two ubiquitous architectural features not shared with typical CNNs: local recurrence within cortical areas, and long-range feedback from downstream areas to upstream areas. Here we explored the role of recurrence in improving classification performance. We found that standard forms of recurrence (vanilla RNNs and LSTMs) do not perform well within deep CNNs on the ImageNet task. In contrast, custom cells that incorporated two structural features, bypassing and gating, were able to boost task accuracy substantially. We extended these design principles in an automated search over thousands of model architectures, which identified novel local recurrent cells and long-range feedback connections useful for object recognition. Moreover, these task-optimized ConvRNNs explained the dynamics of neural activity in the primate visual system better than feedforward networks, suggesting a role for the brain\&$\#$39;s recurrent connections in performing difficult visual behaviors.

}, doi = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00053}, url = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.00053.pdf}, author = {Aran Nayebi and Daniel Bear and Kubilius, Jonas and Ganguli, S and Sussillo, D and DiCarlo, James J. and Yamins, DLK} }