@article {107,
	title = {Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey},
	journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience},
	volume = {19},
	year = {1999},
	month = {01/1999},
	pages = {401 - 419},
	abstract = {<p>This is the second in a series of studies of the neural representation of tactile spatial form in cortical area 3b of the alert monkey. We previously studied the spatial structure of 330 area 3b neuronal receptive fields (RFs) on the fingerpad with random dot patterns scanned at one velocity (40 mm/sec;\&nbsp;<a class="xref-bibr" href="https://www.jneurosci.org/content/19/1/401.short$\#$ref-8" id="xref-ref-8-1" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: bold; font-stretch: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-family: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 119, 192);">DiCarlo et al., 1998</a>). Here, we analyze the temporal structure of 84 neuronal RFs by studying their spatial structure at three scanning velocities (20, 40, and 80 mm/sec). As in the previous study, most RFs contained a single, central, excitatory region and one or more surrounding or flanking inhibitory regions. The mean time delay between skin stimulation and its excitatory effect was 15.5 msec. Except for differences in mean rate, each neuron\&rsquo;s response and the spatial structure of its RF were essentially unaffected by scanning velocity. This is the expected outcome when excitatory and inhibitory effects are brief and synchronous. However, that interpretation is consistent neither with the reported timing of excitation and inhibition in somatosensory cortex nor with the third study in this series, which investigates the effect of scanning direction and shows that one component of inhibition lags behind excitation. We reconcile these observations by showing that overlapping (in-field) inhibition delayed relative to excitation can produce RF spatial structure that is unaffected by changes in scanning velocity. Regardless of the mechanisms, the velocity invariance of area 3b RF structure is consistent with the velocity invariance of tactile spatial perception (e.g., roughness estimation and form recognition).</p>
},
	keywords = {Adaptation, Animals, Brain Mapping, Cortical Synchronization, Evoked Potentials, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neural Inhibition, Physiological, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Fields},
	issn = {0270-6474},
	doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00401.1999},
	url = {http://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-01-00401.1999},
	author = {DiCarlo, James J. and Johnson, Kenneth O.}
}
