@article {105, title = {Form representation in monkey inferotemporal cortex is virtually unaltered by free viewing}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {3}, year = {2000}, month = {01/2000}, pages = {814 - 821}, abstract = {

How are objects represented in the brain during natural behavior? Visual object recognition in primates is thought to depend on the inferotemporal cortex {(IT).} In most neurophysiological studies of {IT,} monkeys hold their direction of gaze fixed while isolated visual stimuli are presented (controlled viewing). However, during natural behavior, primates visually explore cluttered environments by changing gaze direction several times each second (free viewing). We examined the effect of free viewing on {IT} neuronal responses in monkeys engaged in a form-recognition task. By making small, real-time stimulus adjustments, we produced nearly identically retinal stimulation during controlled and free viewing. Nearly 90\% of neuronal responses were unaffected by free viewing, and average stimulus selectivity was unchanged. Thus, neuronal representations that likely underlie form recognition are virtually unaltered by free viewing.

}, keywords = {Animals, Conditioning, Fixation, Form Perception, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Ocular, Pattern Recognition, Photic Stimulation, Psychology, Saccades, Temporal Lobe, Visual, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/77722}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/nn0800_814}, author = {DiCarlo, James J. and Maunsell, John H. R.} } @article {119, title = {Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function.}, journal = {Psychological Review}, volume = {99}, year = {1992}, month = {04/1992}, pages = {268 - 305}, abstract = {

Hippocampal participation in classical conditioning is described in terms of a multilayer network that portrays stimulus configuration. The network (a) describes behavior in real time, (b) incorporates a layer of \"hidden\" units positioned between input and output units, (c) includes inputs that are connected to the output directly as well as indirectly through the hidden-unit layer, and (d) uses a biologically plausible backpropagation procedure to train the hidden-unit layer. Nodes and connections in the neural network are mapped onto regional cerebellar, cortical, and hippocampal circuits, and the effect of lesions of different brain regions is formally studied. Computer simulations of the following classical conditioning paradigms are presented: acquisition of delay and trace conditioning, extinction, acquisition-extinction series of delay conditioning, blocking, over-shadowing, discrimination acquisition, discrimination reversal, feature-positive discrimination, conditioned inhibition, negative patterning, positive patterning, and generalization. The model correctly describes the effect of hippocampal and cortical lesions in many of these paradigms, as well as neural activity in hippocampus and medial septum during classical conditioning. Some of these results might be extended to the description of anterograde amnesia in human patients.

}, keywords = {Animals, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Classical, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Neural Pathways, Neurological}, issn = {0033-295X}, doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.268}, url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.268}, author = {Schmajuk, Nestor A. and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {122, title = {A neural network approach to hippocampal function in classical conditioning.}, journal = {Behavioral Neuroscience}, volume = {105}, year = {1991}, month = {01/1991}, pages = {82 - 110}, abstract = {

Hippocampal participation in classical conditioning in terms of S. Grossberg\&$\#$39;s (1975) attentional theory is described. According to the theory, pairing of a conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) causes both an association of the sensory representation of the CS with the UCS (conditioned reinforcement learning) and an association of the sensory representation of the CS with the drive representation of the UCS (incentive motivation learning). Sensory representations compete for a limited-capacity short-term memory (STM). The STM regulation hypothesis, which proposes that the hippocampus controls incentive motivation, self-excitation, and competition among sensory representations thereby regulating the contents of a limited capacity STM, is introduced. Under the STM regulation hypothesis, nodes and connections in Grossberg\&$\#$39;s neural network are mapped onto regional hippocampal-cerebellar circuits. The resulting neural model provides (a) a framework for understanding the dynamics of information processing and storage in the hippocampus and cerebellum during classical conditioning of the rabbit\&$\#$39;s nictitating membrane, (b) principles for understanding the effect of different hippocampal manipulations on classical conditioning, and (c) novel and testable predictions.\ 

}, keywords = {Animals, Cerebellum, Classical, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Extinction, Eyelid, Hippocampus, Models, Nerve Net, Neurological, Neurons, Psychological, Rabbits, Reaction Time}, issn = {0735-7044}, doi = {10.1037/0735-7044.105.1.82}, url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0735-7044.105.1.82}, author = {Schmajuk, Nestor A. and DiCarlo, James J.} }