@article {178, title = {fROI-level computational models enable broad-scale experimental testing and expose key divergences between models and brains}, journal = {Journal of Vision}, volume = {23}, year = {2023}, month = {2023}, pages = {5788 - 5788}, abstract = {

Deep convolutional neural network (DNN)- based models have emerged as our leading hypotheses of human vision. Here we describe, and expand upon, our latest effort to use DNN models of brain regions to explain key results from previous cognitive neuroscience and psychology experiments. Many stimuli in these prior experiments were highly manipulated (e.g. scrambled body parts, face parts, re-arranged spatial positions) often outside the domain of natural stimuli. These results can therefore be considered as tests of model generalization beyond naturalistic stimuli. We first performed these tests on the fusiform face area (FFA), parahippocampal place area (PPA) and the extrastriate body area (EBA). Our previous results (presented in VSS2022) showed that our fROI-level models recapitulate several key results from prior studies. We also observed that models did not perform as well on non-naturalistic stimuli. Here we extend our model evaluation metrics in two ways. First, we replicated findings from the original paper on the EBA (Downing et al 2001) that the EBA responds as highly to line drawings of bodies, and symbolic stick figures as to natural images of bodies (and not to control conditions like faces and objects). Second, we find that none of the computational models explain this pattern of observed responses, though models trained with language-based supervision (like CLIP) do better than other models. Together, our results on symbolic body images expose the bounds of current computational models. This progress was made possible only because of fROI-level modeling procedures, and opens up new ways to understand the power and limitations of current models and test novel hypotheses completely in-silico.

}, isbn = {1534-7362}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.9.5788}, author = {Mieczkowski, Elizabeth and Abate, Alex and De Faria, Willian and Lydic, Kirsten and DiCarlo, James and Kanwisher, Nancy and Apurva Ratan Murty, N.} } @article {153, title = {Fast Recurrent Processing Via Ventral Prefrontal Cortex is Needed by the Primate Ventral Stream for Robust Core Visual Object Recognition}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {109}, year = {2021}, pages = {164-167.e5}, chapter = {164}, abstract = {

Distributed neural population spiking patterns in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex that support core visual object recognition require additional time to develop for specific (\“late-solved\”) images suggesting the necessity of recurrent processing in these computations. Which brain circuit motifs are most responsible for computing and transmitting these putative recurrent signals to IT? To test whether the ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) is a critical recurrent circuit node in this system, here we pharmacologically inactivated parts of the vPFC and simultaneously measured IT population activity, while monkeys performed object discrimination tasks. Our results show that vPFC inactivation deteriorated the quality of the late-phase (\>150 ms from image onset) IT population code, along with commensurate, specific behavioral deficits for \“late-solved\” images. Finally, silencing vPFC caused the monkeys\’ IT activity patterns and behavior to become more like those produced by feedforward artificial neural network models of the ventral stream. Together with prior work, these results argue that fast recurrent processing through the vPFC is critical to the production of behaviorally-sufficient object representations in IT.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.035}, url = {https://www.cell.com/neuron/pdf/S0896-6273(20)30759-5.pdf}, author = {Kar, Kohitij and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {6, title = {Fast recurrent processing via ventral prefrontal cortex is needed by the primate ventral stream for robust core visual object recognition}, journal = {BioRxiv}, year = {2020}, month = {05/2020}, type = {preprint}, abstract = {

Distributed neural population spiking patterns in macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex that support core visual object recognition require additional time to develop for specific (\"late-solved\") images suggesting the necessity of recurrent processing in these computations. Which brain circuit motifs are most responsible for computing and transmitting these putative recurrent signals to IT? To test whether the ventral prefrontal cortex (vPFC) is a critical recurrent circuit node in this system, here we pharmacologically inactivated parts of the vPFC and simultaneously measured IT population activity, while monkeys performed object discrimination tasks. Our results show that vPFC inactivation deteriorated the quality of the late-phase (\>150 ms from image onset) IT population code, along with commensurate, specific behavioral deficits for \"late-solved\" images. Finally, silencing vPFC caused the monkeys\&$\#$39; IT activity patterns and behavior to become more like those produced by feedforward artificial neural network models of the ventral stream. Together with prior work, these results argue that fast recurrent processing through the vPFC is critical to the production of behaviorally-sufficient object representations in IT.

}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.10.086959}, url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.10.086959v1}, author = {Kohitij Kar and James J. DiCarlo} } @inbook {12, title = {Funcitional Properties of Circuits, Cellular Populations, and Areas}, booktitle = {The Neocortex}, volume = {27}, year = {2019}, pages = {223-265}, publisher = {The MIT Press}, organization = {The MIT Press}, chapter = {13}, address = {Cambridge, MA}, issn = {978-0-262-04324-3}, doi = {10.7551/mitpress/12593.001.0001}, url = {http://www.esforum.de}, author = {Harris, KD and Groh, JM and DiCarlo, JJ and Fries, P and Kaschube, M and Laurent, G and MacLean, JN and McCormick, DA and Pipa, G and Reynolds, JN and Schwartz, AB and Sejnowksi, TJ and Singer, W and Vinck, M}, editor = {Singer, Wolf and Sejnowski, Terrence J. and Rakic, Pasko} } @proceedings {44, title = {From luminance to semantics: how natural objects are represented in monkey inferotemporal cortex}, journal = {Computational and Systems Neuroscience (COSYNE)}, year = {2011}, month = {02/2011}, publisher = {COSYNE}, address = {Salt Lake City, Utah, USA}, abstract = {

In primates, visual object information is processed through a hierarchy of cortico-cortical stages that culminates with the inferotemporal cortex (IT). Although the nature of visual processing in IT is still poorly understood, several lines of evidence suggest that IT conveys an explicit object representation that can directly serve as a basis for decision, action and memory - e.g., it can support flexible formation of semantic categories in downstream areas, such as prefrontal and perirhinal cortex. However, some recent studies (Kiani et al, 2007; Kriegeskorte et al, 2008) have argued that IT neuronal ensembles may themselves code the semantic membership of visual objects (i.e., represent such abstract conceptual classes such as animate and inanimate objects, animals, etc). In this study, we have applied an array of multi-variate computational approaches to investigate the nature of visual objects\&$\#$39; representation in IT. Our results show that IT neuronal ensembles represent a surprisingly broad spectrum of visual features complexity, ranging from low-level visual properties (e.g., brightness), to visual patterns of intermediate complexity (e.g., star-like shapes), to complex objects (e.g., four-leg animals) that appear to be coded so invariantly that their clustering in the IT neuronal space is not easily accountable by any similarity metric we used. On the one hand, these findings show that IT supports recognition of low-level properties of the visual input that are typically though to be extracted by lower-level visual areas. On the other hand, IT appears to convey such an explicit representation of some object classes that coding of semantic membership in IT (at least for a few categories) cannot be excluded. Overall, these results shed new light on IT amazing pluripotency in supporting recognition tasks as diverse as detection of brightness and categorization of complex shapes.

}, url = {http://www.cosyne.org/c/index.php?title=Cosyne_11_posters/I-89}, author = {Pagan, Marino and Neissi, AA and Baldassi, Carlo and Zecchina, Riccardo and DiCarlo, James J. and Zoccolan, Davide} } @article {54, title = {Fine-Scale Spatial Organization of Face and Object Selectivity in the Temporal Lobe: Do Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Optical Imaging, and Electrophysiology Agree?}, journal = {Journal of Neuroscience}, volume = {28}, year = {2008}, month = {12/2008}, pages = {11796 - 11801}, abstract = {

The spatial organization of the brain\&$\#$39;s object and face representations in the temporal lobe is critical for understanding high-level vision and cognition but is poorly understood. Recently, exciting progress has been made using advanced imaging and physiology methods in humans and nonhuman primates, and the combination of such methods may be particularly powerful. Studies applying these methods help us to understand how neuronal activity, optical imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging signals are related within the temporal lobe, and to uncover the fine-grained and large-scale spatial organization of object and face representations in the primate brain.

}, issn = {0270-6474}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3799-08.2008}, url = {http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3799-08.2008}, author = {Op de Beeck, H. P. and DiCarlo, J. J. and Goense, J. B. M. and Grill-Spector, K. and Papanastassiou, A. and Tanifuji, M. and Tsao, D. Y.} } @proceedings {85, title = {Flexible and robust object recognition in inferior temporal cortex supported by neurons with limited position and clutter tolerance}, journal = {Society for Neuroscience}, year = {2006}, month = {10/2006}, publisher = {SFN}, address = {Atlanta, GA, USA}, author = {Li, N. and Cox, David D. and Zoccolan, Davide and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {88, title = {Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex}, journal = {Science}, volume = {310}, year = {2005}, month = {04/2005}, pages = {863 - 866}, abstract = {

Understanding the brain computations leading to object recognition requires quantitative characterization of the information represented in inferior temporal (IT) cortex. We used a biologically plausible, classifier-based readout technique to investigate the neural coding of selectivity and invariance at the IT population level. The activity of small neuronal populations (approximately 100 randomly selected cells) over very short time intervals (as small as 12.5 milliseconds) contained unexpectedly accurate and robust information about both object \"identity\" and \"category.\" This information generalized over a range of object positions and scales, even for novel objects. Coarse information about position and scale could also be read out from the same population.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Mapping, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Psychology, Psychomotor Performance, Recognition, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Visual Perception}, issn = {0036-8075}, doi = {10.1126/science.1117593}, url = {https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1117593}, author = {Hung, Chou P. and Kreiman, Gabriel and Poggio, Tomaso and DiCarlo, James J.} } @article {105, title = {Form representation in monkey inferotemporal cortex is virtually unaltered by free viewing}, journal = {Nature Neuroscience}, volume = {3}, year = {2000}, month = {01/2000}, pages = {814 - 821}, abstract = {

How are objects represented in the brain during natural behavior? Visual object recognition in primates is thought to depend on the inferotemporal cortex {(IT).} In most neurophysiological studies of {IT,} monkeys hold their direction of gaze fixed while isolated visual stimuli are presented (controlled viewing). However, during natural behavior, primates visually explore cluttered environments by changing gaze direction several times each second (free viewing). We examined the effect of free viewing on {IT} neuronal responses in monkeys engaged in a form-recognition task. By making small, real-time stimulus adjustments, we produced nearly identically retinal stimulation during controlled and free viewing. Nearly 90\% of neuronal responses were unaffected by free viewing, and average stimulus selectivity was unchanged. Thus, neuronal representations that likely underlie form recognition are virtually unaltered by free viewing.

}, keywords = {Animals, Conditioning, Fixation, Form Perception, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Ocular, Pattern Recognition, Photic Stimulation, Psychology, Saccades, Temporal Lobe, Visual, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/77722}, url = {http://www.nature.com/articles/nn0800_814}, author = {DiCarlo, James J. and Maunsell, John H. R.} } @proceedings {108, title = {Form processing in area 3b}, journal = {International Symposium on Brain Mechanisms of Tactile Perception}, year = {1999}, month = {1999}, address = {Stockholm, Sweden}, author = {DiCarlo, James J. and Johnson, Kenneth O} } @inbook {113, title = {Form processing and attention effects in somatosensory cortex}, booktitle = {Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex}, year = {1996}, publisher = {Birkhauser Basel}, organization = {Birkhauser Basel}, address = {Switzerland}, issn = {978-3-0348-9016-8}, author = {Hsiao, Steven S. and Johnson, Kenneth O and Twombly, IA and DiCarlo, James J.}, editor = {Franzen, O and Johansson, R and Terenius, L} }